I read the Politico every day. It is an excellent political
journal with outstanding writers.
One story posted a while ago caught my interest. It was about Michelle Kwan and
controversy she encountered when she did a commercial for Coke and the
hypocrisy of her serving on President Obama’s Council on Fitness, Nutrition and
Sports.
Ms. Kwan was harshly criticized by some association I have
never heard of and does not deserve a mention in this piece. Yes, this sounds
cynical, but sometimes I think third tier no name associations make such ridiculous
charges against a celebrity to gain their (undeserved) 15 minutes of fame. And by raising the organization’s profile,
also raise funds.
Now I do not get it.
Ms. Kwan is a talented athlete and intelligent lady. For her to endorse
Coca-Cola and also serve on a fitness and nutrition council does not raise any
red flags to me. Ms. Kwan is not saying
drink a 12 pack of Coke every day.
Have we become so inflexible that you must agree entirely with
an organization? Not getting it. I
cannot get my family to agree with me on 100 percent of everything I know is
right, so why would I expect it from anyone else. And yes, I do know what is right.
Frankly, in debate we called this a red herring. You have
nothing else to say, so attack something so insignificant and try to blow it
out of proportion. Put the other side on the defensive. Or in this case, put Ms. Kwan on the
defensive.
My suggested response for Ms. Kwan, “I apologize, now who did
you say is criticizing me for my commercial and public service activities?” She is told the name of the organization. And
her response is “Never heard of it.”